Chapter 14 – The Spirit of Rebellion: When Order Becomes Oppression

“In those days there was no king in Israel. Everyone did what was right in his own eyes.”
— Judges 21:25

We live in an age where authority has become suspect, structure is treated as violence, and order is often interpreted as oppression. The very idea that something may be given—whether in nature, in Scripture, or in tradition—is regarded not as a gift but as a threat. In its place, we are told, must come liberation: from institutions, from hierarchies, from roles, from constraints. And yet, in the process of dismantling these external constraints, we have also shattered the internal compass that gave them meaning. What remains is not liberty, but fragmentation. Not freedom, but formlessness.

This unraveling of authority is not merely a political phenomenon. It is intellectual, cultural, and ultimately spiritual. The seeds were sown in the lecture halls of Paris and Berlin long before they blossomed into slogans and policies. It is no exaggeration to say that our contemporary moral imagination has been shaped—sometimes unknowingly—by a handful of thinkers whose central premise is this: that behind every structure lies a will to dominate, and therefore, all structures must fall.

To understand the full weight of this shift, we must revisit three of its key architects: Michel Foucault, Judith Butler, and Angela Davis. Each, in their own way, contributed to the redefinition of power, the deconstruction of identity, and the dismantling of traditional authority. But beneath their critiques lies a deeper impulse—one far older than postmodern theory. The Scriptures call it the spirit of rebellion.

From Truth to Power: Foucault’s Legacy

Michel Foucault was perhaps the most influential intellectual force behind what has become the default moral reflex of our time: suspicion toward all claims of authority. In Foucault’s view, there is no such thing as neutral knowledge. What we call “truth” is not the disinterested pursuit of reality, but the codified outcome of struggles for power. Hospitals, schools, churches, governments—these are not guardians of order and well-being, but instruments of social control, masking their dominance behind discourses of care.

This idea—that all structures are suspect, because all structures conceal power—has permeated every level of society. From academic curricula to HR training modules, from identity politics to media analysis, the Foucauldian reflex has become automatic: to unmask, to decode, to deconstruct. In this world, the very act of defining is an act of oppression. The boundaries between male and female, sane and insane, legal and criminal—these are not distinctions based in nature or morality but the result of power dynamics that must be overturned.

Foucault’s genius was not in proposing an alternative moral framework, but in refusing to provide one. He offered no path to order, only a mirror showing the fractures in our current one. The vacuum he left behind would be filled by others.

Gender as Subversion: Butler and the Undoing of Identity

Judith Butler took Foucault’s analysis of discourse and power and applied it to the realm of gender. If truth is socially constructed, then so too is identity. Male and female, she argued, are not biological givens but performative roles—scripts we are forced to enact by a culture bent on reinforcing binary norms. According to Butler, there is no essential self, no core reality—only the illusion created by the repetition of societal expectations.

To liberate the self, then, one must not conform to these roles but disrupt them. Subversion becomes salvation. Drag becomes prophecy. Gender becomes not something to be received, but something to be endlessly revised.

The influence of Butler’s work is difficult to overstate. Her ideas form the conceptual backbone of much of the contemporary gender discourse, especially in Western academia and law. In the last two decades, her theories have migrated from elite theoretical circles to TikTok videos, educational policy, corporate HR practices, and the grammar of government documents.

And yet the consequences are deeply destabilizing. If identity is merely performance, then who am I when the performance ends? If my body lies to me and society lies to me, where can I go for truth? The self, once stable and known, has become anxious, exhausted, and deeply lonely.

Tearing Down the Roots: Davis and the Attack on the Family

Angela Davis, a towering figure in both civil rights activism and critical theory, extended this suspicion of authority to the most foundational institution of all: the family. Drawing on Marxist and feminist frameworks, Davis argued that the nuclear family was not a natural or neutral unit, but a social construct designed to reproduce capitalist inequality and patriarchal control. Especially in the context of race and class, the family was, in her view, an agent of systemic oppression.

To imagine a just society, then, one must not merely reform public institutions but dismantle private ones. The call to “abolish the family”—once fringe—is now echoed in segments of progressive academia and activism. Child autonomy, communal parenting, and the de-centering of parental authority are presented not as radical ideas but as moral imperatives. In this vision, the state—or the collective—becomes the nurturing agent. The parent becomes suspect.

This represents a profound anthropological rupture. In the biblical worldview, the family is not incidental—it is foundational. It is the first institution established by God, a mirror of covenantal love, a training ground for moral formation. To tear it down is not merely to alter policy; it is to rewrite what it means to be human.

Naming the Spirit: Rebellion in Theological Perspective

It is tempting to treat all of the above as merely intellectual trends, the passing fashions of elite discourse. But Scripture compels us to look deeper. What unites these otherwise distinct theories is a common instinct: to cast off what is given, to declare independence from order, and to see constraint not as protection, but as harm.

This is not new.

In Eden, the serpent whispered the same suspicion that animates much of modern theory: “Did God really say?” And later: “You will not surely die... you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” The temptation was not to become an atheist, but to become autonomous. To be free from divine limits. To redefine good and evil on one’s own terms.

This is what Scripture calls rebellion—a spiritual posture that refuses to receive and insists on constructing reality apart from God. It is not merely about disobedience, but about dethroning the Creator in favor of the creature. The Apostle Paul describes it starkly in Romans 1: “They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator.”

Rebellion does not always look like riot. It can come cloaked in philosophy. It can speak in tones of compassion. It may call itself liberation. But when it seeks to dismantle God-given structures—truth, gender, family, the very moral order of the universe—it betrays its deeper allegiance. The biblical story calls it what it is: the spirit of rebellion.

Redeeming Authority: The Biblical Alternative

Yet the Christian response is not to idolize tradition or defend all structures uncritically. The Bible is clear: not all authority is good, and power can be abused. But abuse does not nullify use. Authority is not the problem; sin is. The solution is not deconstruction, but redemption.

Throughout Scripture, we see authority exercised not as domination but as service:

In this light, authority is not oppressive—it is protective. It is God’s way of weaving love into form, channeling strength into safety, and creating space for human flourishing. Rightful authority reflects the character of God: truth with grace, strength with tenderness.

Where rebellion tears down, redemption builds. Where suspicion destroys, love restores. And where the world offers chaos in the name of freedom, the Gospel offers peace through a crucified King.

Toward Restoration: A Closing Meditation

The longing beneath every cry for liberation is not wrong. It is the method of liberation that matters. We were made for freedom—but not for formlessness. We were made for love—but not without boundaries. We were made for selfhood—but not for isolation or self-invention.

In a culture where authority is treated as violence, we must offer a vision where authority is reclaimed as love. In a world taught to deconstruct, we must rebuild. Not with force, but with faithfulness. Not with slogans, but with service. Not with suspicion, but with truth.

And in doing so, we do not defend the old merely because it is old—but because, when rightly understood, it bears the fingerprints of the One who made us.

Let us recover the goodness of order. Let us honor the God who gives shape to our lives. And let us walk not in rebellion, but in joyful submission to the One whose authority lays down its life to save.

Return to Table of Contents